Practice interviews

How many units can receive the full test?

Bramble Devices plans to test 120 units of one new revision in a shift.

The question

Each station completes a whole test on one unit at a time. The two stations can work independently. No operator or shared-resource limit affects this case.

Opening test plan
Amount
Independent stations2
Usable minutes per station420
Approved base test minutes per unit6
Target units120

The proposed schedule also mentions a repeat measurement. Check its approved frequency before you book it.

“Tell the test lead whether the target fits without omitting a required check.”

A strong answer, step by step

Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.

Step 1: What is the base capacity?

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Plan for 70 units because each test uses one station

    Tempting, but it misses something. Both stations can work at the same time.

  • Plan for up to 140 base tests across the two stations

    The strong move. Each station can complete 420 divided by 6, or 70.

  • Promise 140 for the final plan

    Tempting, but it misses something. The capacity still depends on the approved repeat requirement.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Each station can complete 70 tests, for 140 in total. Testing 120 units takes 720 of the 840 available station-minutes, leaving 120 with a balanced load.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: Capacity is a count of whole units. The sum of station-minutes gives the workload margin.

Step 2: Can you commit to the AI draft?

The AI-drafted workbook reserves 1.5 extra station-minutes for one in ten units. It does not cite an approved repeat frequency.

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Book the draft as final because 738 is less than 840

    Tempting, but it misses something. Capacity alone does not establish the required coverage.

  • Use 738 as a conditional estimate and verify the test revision

    The strong move. This gives the test lead an estimate and the condition it depends on.

  • Ignore the extra measurement because the base plan fits

    Tempting, but it misses something. The test revision can add time to every completed unit.

See how a strong candidate says it

“If one-in-ten sampling were allowed, 12 repeats would add 18 minutes and bring the workload to 738 station-minutes. That fits. I would check the approved repeat frequency before I commit.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The workbook provides a scheduling assumption. It gives no approval to sample.

Step 3: What is the full-test capacity now?

The signed test change requires the 1.5-minute repeat on every unit in this revision, on the same station before the unit counts as complete.

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Keep the sample plan to preserve the target

    Tempting, but it misses something. The signed revision requires the repeat on every unit.

  • Count the 6-minute test as complete and schedule the repeat later

    Tempting, but it misses something. The case counts a unit only after the repeat on the same station.

  • Plan for 112 full tests and ask for the 60-minute gap

    The strong move. This preserves every required check and gives the schedule owner a measurable choice.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Every unit takes 7.5 minutes. Each station can complete 56, so the two stations complete 112. We are 8 units short of 120, which needs 60 more usable station-minutes.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The approved requirement applies to every unit in this revision. The sample-based draft leaves required work out.

Step 4: What plan do you give the test lead?

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Ask for more usable station time or split the work into two windows

    The strong move. The lead gets two schedules that retain the full approved test.

  • Make up the time by letting both stations skip four repeats

    Tempting, but it misses something. Skipping checks changes the approved per-unit requirement.

  • Count 120 units as complete if the last eight have started

    Tempting, but it misses something. Started units have not finished the required test.

See how a strong candidate says it

“I would ask for 30 more usable minutes on each station to complete 60 units per station. If that time is unavailable, I would schedule 112 this shift and eight in a second window.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The 120 full tests use 900 station-minutes. Either schedule accounts for all required work.

The answer, in short

Decision
Retain the per-unit repeat and plan 112 complete tests in the original window.
Because
The target needs 900 station-minutes. The two stations have 840 usable minutes.
What would change it
An extra 30 minutes on each station would support 120 complete tests in the extended window.

Common traps

  • Check which units need a repeated measurement.
  • Count only whole tests completed at a station.

Check your answer

  • I calculated base capacity.
  • I checked the draft assumption.
  • I used the approved repeat requirement.
  • I offered two complete schedules.

Last reviewed Nov 11, 2026